30% of the surveyed companies have websites created using website builders.
Of these, 10% are on the Tilda platform.
At the same time:
- 33.3% of respondents did not know which platform their website would be built on at the time of development;
- almost 43% indicated that the limitations of the website builder would have influenced their decision if they had known about them in advance.
This can be compared to constructing an office without understanding what materials are being used or whether it will be possible to add a second floor.
66.7% of respondents answered that the developer informed them:
- which platform the website would be built on;
- which country the service is from.
At the same time, every third business did not receive this information.
It’s not always malicious intent. Developers often focus on launch speed or the client’s budget. But for a business, such “saving at the entry point” can create difficulties during the growth stage.
According to the survey results, businesses choose a platform based on a combination of factors:
- convenience of the admin panel;
- flexibility of settings and customization;
- speed of launch;
- economic considerations;
- marketing goals;
- SEO capabilities;
- availability of specialists for support;
- country of origin of the platform.
This is a logical and pragmatic set of criteria. The problem arises when some of these factors are evaluated only after the launch rather than before it.
Even knowing the origins of the platform, businesses are not always ready for change.
65% of companies with websites on Tilda are aware of the potential reputational and political risks, but continue to use the service.
The main reasons:
Finances
58% do not want to spend money on developing a new website.
The argument sounds familiar:
“Why remake something that works and brings in money?”
Technical Habit
35% noted that the platform seems convenient, fast, and “everything is already available out of the box.”
This is an understandable approach. But it works only until the business starts to:
- scale marketing;
- build complex funnels;
- work systematically with SEO;
- integrate the website with CRM, analytics, automation.
38.1% of respondents believe that the country of origin of the platform matters to their audience.
33.3% think that it does not matter.
Almost another third are unsure.
At the same time, 90.5% of users notice the platform logos in the website footer.
This means that the technical solution is not as “invisible” as business owners might think.
53% of respondents were not aware of the SEO limitations of website builders at the time of creating their site.
Website builders are suitable for a quick start, but have limitations:
- in page structure;
- in working with technical SEO;
- in scaling content;
- in flexibility of search engine optimization.
That is why many companies start considering changing platforms when their website no longer supports business growth.
52.4% of respondents have a positive attitude towards changing the platform if it improves functionality or SEO.
38.1% are neutral.
Only 9.5% are negative.
This indicates one thing: businesses are ready for change when they understand its value.
A website platform is not just a technical solution.
It is a matter of:
- control;
- scalability;
- reputation;
- long-term efficiency.
The use of Russian services today is often the result of a lack of awareness or short-term decisions, rather than a conscious choice.
Knowing the platform your website runs on gives your business the opportunity to:
- manage risks;
- plan development;
- make informed decisions.
- Find out which platform your website is built on and what limitations it has.
- Evaluate the platform not only in terms of “it works now”, but also in terms of future growth.
- Compare alternatives and consider not only the development cost, but also the potential costs of future losses.
Knowledge is not about control.
It is about the freedom to make decisions that work for the business rather than limit it.
Kateryna Solikova